The role of massage in scar management: a literature review

Background: Many surgeons recommend postoperative scar massage to improve aesthetic outcome, although scar massage regimens vary greatly.

Objective: To review the regimens and efficacy of scar massage.

Methods: PubMed was searched using the following key words: "massage" in combination with "scar," or "linear," "hypertrophic," "keloid," "diasta*," "atrophic." Information on study type, scar type, number of patients, scar location, time to onset of massage therapy, treatment protocol, treatment duration, outcomes measured, and response to treatment was tabulated.

Results: Ten publications including 144 patients who received scar massage were examined in this review. Time to treatment onset ranged from after suture removal to longer than 2 years. Treatment protocols ranged from 10 minutes twice daily to 30 minutes twice weekly. Treatment duration varied from one treatment to 6 months. Overall, 65 patients (45.7%) experienced clinical improvement based on Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale score, Vancouver Scar Scale score, range of motion, pruritus, pain, mood, depression, or anxiety. Of 30 surgical scars treated with massage, 27 (90%) had improved appearance or Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale score.

Conclusions: The evidence for the use of scar massage is weak, regimens used are varied, and outcomes measured are neither standardized nor reliably objective, although its efficacy appears to be greater in postsurgical scars than traumatic or postburn scars. Although scar massage is anecdotally effective, there is scarce scientific data in the literature to support it.

© 2011 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Similar articles

Bianchi FA, Roccia F, Fiorini P, Berrone S. Bianchi FA, et al. J Craniofac Surg. 2010 May;21(3):719-23. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181d841af. J Craniofac Surg. 2010. PMID: 20485035

Widgerow AD, Chait LA, Stals PJ, Stals R, Candy G. Widgerow AD, et al. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009 Jul;33(4):533-43. doi: 10.1007/s00266-008-9276-x. Epub 2008 Dec 2. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009. PMID: 19048338 Clinical Trial.

Ault P, Plaza A, Paratz J. Ault P, et al. Burns. 2018 Feb;44(1):24-38. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jun 29. Burns. 2018. PMID: 28669442

Liu A, Moy RL, Ozog DM. Liu A, et al. Dermatol Surg. 2011 Dec;37(12):1740-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02166.x. Epub 2011 Sep 14. Dermatol Surg. 2011. PMID: 22093099 Review.

Iannello S, Milazzo P, Bordonaro F, Belfiore F. Iannello S, et al. MedGenMed. 2006 Dec 20;8(4):60. MedGenMed. 2006. PMID: 17415337 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by

Yang J, Chu R, Chen Z, Qiu J, Pang Z, Yang H. Yang J, et al. Int Wound J. 2024 Feb;21(2):e14777. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14777. Int Wound J. 2024. PMID: 38361227 Free PMC article.

Ferreira BR, Aguirre CC, Rapoport-Hubschman N, Adewuya AO, Canchy L, Morizet D, Vincenzi F, McGlone FP. Ferreira BR, et al. Skin Health Dis. 2023 Dec 1;4(1):e310. doi: 10.1002/ski2.310. eCollection 2024 Feb. Skin Health Dis. 2023. PMID: 38312257 Free PMC article. Review.

Zhang L, Xu W, Zhang L, Cui X, Cheng F. Zhang L, et al. Int Wound J. 2024 Jan;21(1):e14633. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14633. Int Wound J. 2024. PMID: 38272803 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.

Gill HS, O-Wern L, Tiwari P, Gill GKS, Goh C, Hung J, Lee JT, Lim TC, Lim J, Yap YL, Nallathamby V. Gill HS, et al. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Feb;48(3):461-471. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03696-2. Epub 2023 Nov 9. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024. PMID: 37943348 Review.

Pruksapong C, Jankajorn S, Burusapat C, Wanichjaroen N, Wongprakob N, Techasatian P. Pruksapong C, et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Jun 9;11(6):e5045. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005045. eCollection 2023 Jun. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023. PMID: 37305197 Free PMC article.